Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Leukemia & Lymphomaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Article . 2025
Data sources: Pure Amsterdam UMC
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Treatment and outcome of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a population-based cohort study in the Netherlands

a population-based cohort study in the Netherlands
Authors: Frederik O. Meeuwes; Mirian Brink; Marjolein W. M. van der Poel; Y. I. M. Serroukh; Joost S. P. Vermaat; Gerwin A. Huls; Mintsje de Boer; +3 Authors

Treatment and outcome of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a population-based cohort study in the Netherlands

Abstract

The optimal treatment of patients with breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) that underwent incomplete resection, have advanced stage disease or relapse after resection remains unknown. We describe the treatment and outcome of all 91 Dutch BIA-ALCL patients up to 2023. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Ann Arbor stage I was frequently encountered (74%) compared to stage II (13%) and stage IV (11%). First-line treatment of stage I patients consisted mostly of surgery (88%). Stage II patients were treated with chemotherapy (CT) (67%) or underwent surgery (33%). All stage IV patients received CT. In total, 30% of patients (n = 27) received CT. Relapse frequently occurred (60%) in stage IV disease. The 2-year PFS and OS for stage I, II and IV were 89 and 98%, 83 and 92% and 50 and 90%, respectively. Following second-line treatment, all but one patient remained in remission.

Keywords

RISK, PTCL, treatment, IMPACT, CHEMOTHERAPY, T-CELL, DIAGNOSIS, population-based cohort study, ETOPOSIDE, outcome, SURVIVAL, BIA-ALCL, TRIAL, Breast-implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, CHOP

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities