
pmc: PMC11398360
handle: 20.500.11768/180659 , 2434/1158302 , 11562/1152352
AbstractThe heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders makes researching disorder-specific neurobiological markers an ill-posed problem. Here, we face the need for disease stratification models by presenting a generalizable multivariate normative modelling framework for characterizing brain morphology, applied to bipolar disorder (BD). We employed deep autoencoders in an anomaly detection framework, combined with a confounder removal step integrating training and external validation.The model was trained with healthy control (HC) data from the human connectome project and applied to multi-site external data of HC and BD individuals. We found that brain deviating scores were greater, more heterogeneous, and with increased extreme values in the BD group, with volumes prominently from the basal ganglia, hippocampus and adjacent regions emerging as significantly deviating. Similarly, individual brain deviating maps based on modified z scores expressed higher abnormalities occurrences, but their overall spatial overlap was lower compared to HCs.Our generalizable framework enabled the identification of subject- and group-level brain normative-deviating patterns, a step forward towards the development of more effective and personalized clinical decision support systems and patient stratification in psychiatry.
Adult, Male, Bipolar Disorder, Brain, Anomaly detection, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Article, Anomaly detection; Brain MRI; Multi-site harmonization; Normative modelling; Psychiatric disorders, Deep Learning, Brain MRI, Case-Control Studies, Normative modelling, Connectome, Humans, Female, Psychiatric disorders, Multi-site harmonization
Adult, Male, Bipolar Disorder, Brain, Anomaly detection, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Article, Anomaly detection; Brain MRI; Multi-site harmonization; Normative modelling; Psychiatric disorders, Deep Learning, Brain MRI, Case-Control Studies, Normative modelling, Connectome, Humans, Female, Psychiatric disorders, Multi-site harmonization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
