
arXiv: 2505.11426
handle: 10446/311832 , 10419/320506 , 10419/322124
This paper introduces a novel, scalable methodology to measure individual perceptions of gaps in mental load -- the cognitive and emotional burden associated with organizing household and childcare tasks -- within heterosexual couples. Using original data from the TIMES Observatory in Italy, the study combines time-use diaries with new survey indicators to quantify cognitive labor, emotional fatigue, and the spillover of mental load into the workplace. Results reveal systematic gender asymmetries: women are significantly more likely than men to bear organizational responsibility for domestic tasks, report lower satisfaction with this division, and experience higher emotional fatigue. These burdens are underestimated by their partners. The effects are particularly pronounced among college-educated and employed women, who also report greater spillovers of family responsibilities than men during paid work hours. The perceived responsibility for managing family activities is more strongly associated with within-couple gaps in time use than with the absolute time spent on their execution, underscoring the relational and conflictual nature of mental load.
J16, General Economics (econ.GN), ddc:330, J22, time allocation, time-use data, mental load, mental load; gender; time allocation; time-use data., time-use data; gender; time allocation; mental load;, SECS-P/01 Economia politica, FOS: Economics and business, Quaderni - Working Paper DSE, D91, gender, Economics - General Economics
J16, General Economics (econ.GN), ddc:330, J22, time allocation, time-use data, mental load, mental load; gender; time allocation; time-use data., time-use data; gender; time allocation; mental load;, SECS-P/01 Economia politica, FOS: Economics and business, Quaderni - Working Paper DSE, D91, gender, Economics - General Economics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
