
pmid: 39908113
pmc: PMC11833236
Abstract Curation of literature in life sciences is a growing challenge. The continued increase in the rate of publication, coupled with the relatively fixed number of curators worldwide, presents a major challenge to developers of biomedical knowledgebases. Very few knowledgebases have resources to scale to the whole relevant literature and all have to prioritize their efforts. In this work, we take a first step to alleviating the lack of curator time in RNA science by generating summaries of literature for noncoding RNAs using large language models (LLMs). We demonstrate that high-quality, factually accurate summaries with accurate references can be automatically generated from the literature using a commercial LLM and a chain of prompts and checks. Manual assessment was carried out for a subset of summaries, with the majority being rated extremely high quality. We apply our tool to a selection of >4600 ncRNAs and make the generated summaries available via the RNAcentral resource. We conclude that automated literature summarization is feasible with the current generation of LLMs, provided that careful prompting and automated checking are applied. Database URL: https://rnacentral.org/
Data Curation/methods, Genomics (q-bio.GN), FOS: Computer and information sciences, RNA, Untranslated, Nucleic Acid, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, RNA, Untranslated/genetics, Untranslated/genetics, Databases, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), FOS: Biological sciences, RNA, Humans, Quantitative Biology - Genomics, Original Article, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Data Curation, Software
Data Curation/methods, Genomics (q-bio.GN), FOS: Computer and information sciences, RNA, Untranslated, Nucleic Acid, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, RNA, Untranslated/genetics, Untranslated/genetics, Databases, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), FOS: Biological sciences, RNA, Humans, Quantitative Biology - Genomics, Original Article, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Data Curation, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
