
The article presents an overview of the views of Russian thinkers of the XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries on the issue of the Slavic homeland. The author examines the Danube basin hypothesis («Russian Primary Chronicle»), which dominated Russian historical thought from XIIth to XIXth centuries, the hypothesis of the missing homeland (I. Giesel), the Asia Minor hypothesis (V.N. Tatishchev, M.V. Lomonosov) and notes that in the XVIIIth century historical thought of Russia the issue of the Slavic homeland had no independent significance and was treated within the more politically relevant issue of the origin of Russian state.
русская история, национальная идеология, GN301-674, Archaeology, D1-2009, русская философия, History (General), славянская прародина, CC1-960, Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
русская история, национальная идеология, GN301-674, Archaeology, D1-2009, русская философия, History (General), славянская прародина, CC1-960, Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
