
pmid: 37405942
Objective:To explore adherence to wearing removable cast walkers (RCWs) among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).Method:A qualitative study was conducted by interviewing patients with active DFUs and using knee-high RCWs as their offloading treatment. The interviews were undertaken at two diabetic foot clinics in Jordan, using a semi-structured guide. Data were analysed through content analysis by developing main themes and categories.Results:Following interviews with 10 patients, two main key themes with a total of six categories were identified: theme 1—reporting of adherence levels was inconsistent, included two categories: i) a belief in achieving optimal adherence, and ii) non-adherence was often reported indoors; and theme 2—adherence was a consequence of multiple psychosocial, physiological and environmental factors, which included four categories: i) specific offloading knowledge or beliefs influenced adherence; ii) severity of foot disease influenced adherence; iii) social support benefitted adherence; and iv) physical features of RCWs (the usability of the offloading device) impacted adherence.Conclusion:Patients with active DFUs reported inconsistent levels of adherence to wearing RCWs which, after deeper investigation, seemed to be due to participants' misperceptions of the optimal adherence. Adherence to wearing RCWs also seemed to be impacted by multiple psychosocial, physiological and environmental factors.
Wound Healing, Casts, 150, 610, Patient Compliance/psychology, Diabetic Foot, Walkers, Casts, Surgical, Wound Healing/physiology, Surgical, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Patient Compliance, Diabetic Foot/therapy
Wound Healing, Casts, 150, 610, Patient Compliance/psychology, Diabetic Foot, Walkers, Casts, Surgical, Wound Healing/physiology, Surgical, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Patient Compliance, Diabetic Foot/therapy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
