
The analysis of models and methods of reliability evaluation of hardware and software is carried out. The basic concepts of reliability and safety methods of such systems and situations leading to errors, defects and failures are defined. The definition of reliability and safety of technical systems and software systems is given. The classification of reliability models: predictive, measuring and evaluation types. Evaluation models that are used more in practice are described. The standard of Software life cycle (ISO 15288:2002) is defined, focused on the development and control of system components for errors, starting with the system requirements. The results of application of reliability models (Moussa, Goel-Okomoto, etc.) to small, medium and large projects are presented and their comparative assessment is given. The technological module (TM) of reliability evaluation of complex software systems VPK (1989) is described. The quality model of the standard ISO 9126 (1-4): 2002-2004 with indicators of functionality, reliability, efficiency, etc., which are used in determining the maturity and certificate of the product is shown.
плотность дефектов, отказ, надежность, QA75.5-76.95, безопасность, сертификат качества, завершенность, случайный процесс, ошибка, гарантоспособность, отказоустойчивость, Electronic computers. Computer science, восстанавливаемость, оценка надежности, дефект
плотность дефектов, отказ, надежность, QA75.5-76.95, безопасность, сертификат качества, завершенность, случайный процесс, ошибка, гарантоспособность, отказоустойчивость, Electronic computers. Computer science, восстанавливаемость, оценка надежности, дефект
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
