
doi: 10.1109/18.817506
Summary: The ensemble performance of parallel and serial concatenated turbo codes is considered, where the ensemble is generated by a uniform choice of the interleaver and of the component codes taken from the set of time-varying recursive systematic convolutional codes. Following the derivation of the input-output weight enumeration functions of the ensembles of random parallel and serial concatenated turbo codes, the tangential sphere upper bound is employed to provide improved upper bounds on the block and bit error probabilities of these ensembles of codes for the binary-input additive white Gaussian noise channel, based on coherent detection of equi-energy antipodal signals and maximum-likelihood decoding. The influence of the interleaver length and the memory length of the component codes is investigated. The improved bounding technique proposed here is compared to the conventional union bound and to a recent alternative bounding technique by Duman and Salehi that incorporates modified Gallager bounds. The advantage of the derived bounds is demonstrated for a variety of parallel and serial concatenated coding schemes with either fixed or random recursive systematic convolutional component codes, and it is especially pronounced in the region exceeding the cutoff rate, where the performance of turbo codes is most appealing. These upper bounds are also compared to simulation results of the iterative decoding algorithm.
uniform interleaver, Decoding, Other types of codes, AWGN channel, bit error probabilities, maximum-likelihood decoding, Error probability in coding theory, ensemble performance, iterative decoding, turbo codes, distance spectrum
uniform interleaver, Decoding, Other types of codes, AWGN channel, bit error probabilities, maximum-likelihood decoding, Error probability in coding theory, ensemble performance, iterative decoding, turbo codes, distance spectrum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
