
Background and aims Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is characterised by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and oesinophil tissue infiltration. The EoE Diagnostic Panel (EDP) can distinguish between active and non-active EoE using a set of 77 genes. Recently, the existence of distinct EoE variants featuring symptoms similar to EoE, such as oesophageal dysfunction but lacking eosinophil infiltration, had been determined. Methods We used oesophageal biopsies from patients with histologically active (n=10) and non-active EoE (n=9) as well as from healthy oesophageal controls (n=5) participating in the Swiss Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort Study (SEECS) and analysed the gene expression profile in these biopsies by total RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Moreover, we employed the publicly accessible RNA-seq dataset (series GSE148381) as reported by Greuter et al, encompassing a comprehensive genomic profile of patients presenting with EoE variants. Results A novel, diagnostic gene expression panel that can effectively distinguish patients with histologically active conventional EoE from patients with EoE in histological remission and control individuals, and from three newly discovered EoE variants was identified. Histologically Active EoE Diagnostic Panel (HAEDP) consists of 53 genes that were identified based on differential expression between histologically active EoE, histological remission and controls (p≤0.05). By combining the HAEDP with EDP, we expanded our knowledge about factors that may contribute to the inflammation in EoE and improved our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the disease. Conversely, we suggested a compact group of genes common to both HAEDP and EDP to create a reliable diagnostic tool that might enhance the accuracy of EoE diagnosis. Conclusion We identified a novel set of 53 dysregulated genes that are closely associated with the histological inflammatory activity of EoE. In combination with EDP, our new panel might be a valuable tool for the accurate diagnosis of patients with EoE as well as for monitoring their disease course.
Male, Adult, Adolescent, Biopsy, Gene Expression Profiling, Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Middle Aged, Oesophagus, Young Adult, Esophagus, Eosinophilic Esophagitis/genetics; Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology; Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis; Humans; Female; Male; Transcriptome; Adult; Biopsy; Middle Aged; Adolescent; Esophagus/pathology; Gene Expression Profiling/methods; Case-Control Studies; Young Adult; oesophageal disease; oesophageal disorders; oesophagitis, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Female, Transcriptome
Male, Adult, Adolescent, Biopsy, Gene Expression Profiling, Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Middle Aged, Oesophagus, Young Adult, Esophagus, Eosinophilic Esophagitis/genetics; Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology; Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis; Humans; Female; Male; Transcriptome; Adult; Biopsy; Middle Aged; Adolescent; Esophagus/pathology; Gene Expression Profiling/methods; Case-Control Studies; Young Adult; oesophageal disease; oesophageal disorders; oesophagitis, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Female, Transcriptome
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
