A comparison of two generalized response surface methods for optimisation in electromagnetics
Copyright policy )A comparison of two generalized response surface methods for optimisation in electromagnetics
When dealing with problems entailing time consuming finite element solutions alternative methods are sought which can reduce the number of function calls whilst preserving solution accuracy. Two different strategies for practical electromagnetic design and optimisation are presented and compared. The main features and performance of each are described and evaluated on an analytical and a physical problem.
- University of Southampton United Kingdom
- Imperial College London United Kingdom
- University of Pavia Italy
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil
electromagnetic design, optimisation, generalized response surface methods, Optimization problems in optics and electromagnetic theory, neural networks, Finite element, Galerkin and related methods applied to problems in optics and electromagnetic theory, finite element, Electromagnetic theory (general), fuzzy systems, evolution strategies, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, PDEs in connection with optics and electromagnetic theory
electromagnetic design, optimisation, generalized response surface methods, Optimization problems in optics and electromagnetic theory, neural networks, Finite element, Galerkin and related methods applied to problems in optics and electromagnetic theory, finite element, Electromagnetic theory (general), fuzzy systems, evolution strategies, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, PDEs in connection with optics and electromagnetic theory
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).9 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!