
handle: 10037/20940
This work introduces a novel method that combines machine learning (ML) techniques with dual-polarimetric (dual-pol) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) observations for estimating quad-polarimetric (quad-pol) parameters, which are presumed to contain geophysical sea ice information. In the training phase, the output parameters are generated from quad-pol observations obtained by Radarsat-2 (RS2), and the corresponding input data consist of features obtained from overlapping dual-pol Sentinel-1 (S1) data. Then, two, well-recognized ML methods are studied to learn the functional relationship between the output and input data. These ML approaches are the Gaussian process regression (GPR) and neural network (NN) for regression models. The goal is to use the aforementioned ML techniques to generate Arctic sea ice information from freely available dual-pol observations acquired by S1, which can, in general, only be generated from quad-pol data. Eight overlapping RS2 and S1 scenes were used to train and test the GPR and NN models. Statistical regression performance measures were computed to evaluate the strength of the ML regression methods. Then, two scenes were selected for further evaluation, where overlapping optical images were available as well. This allowed the visual interpretation of the maps estimated by the ML models. Finally, one of the methods was tested on an entire S1 scene to perform prediction on areas outside of the RS2 and S1 overlap. Our results indicate that the studied ML techniques can be utilized to increase the information retrieval capacity of the wide swath dual-pol S1 imagery while embedding physical properties in the methodology.
VDP::Technology: 500::Marine technology: 580, VDP::Teknologi: 500::Marin teknologi: 580
VDP::Technology: 500::Marine technology: 580, VDP::Teknologi: 500::Marin teknologi: 580
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
