
The present article describes the experience of conceptual, categorical, and methodological analysis of the legal life phenomenon. It assesses the critical sides and advantages, reflecting the process of introducing the “legal life” category into legal theory structure. It substantiates the theoretical and methodological potential of the “legal life” category and considers the problem of development of separate methodological approaches to legal life development
Статья посвящена характеристике опыта понятийно-категориального и методологического анализа феномена правовой жизни общества. Оцениваются критические стороны и преимущества, отражающие процесс введения категории «правовая жизнь» в структуру теории права. Обосновывается теоретико-методологический потенциал, присущий категории «правовая жизнь», рассматривается проблема развития отдельных методологических подходов исследования правовой жизни
categories of legal science, научная дискуссия, cultural-historical approach, категории юридической науки, legal life of the society, scientific discussion, methodology, правовая жизнь общества, культурно-исторический подход, legal theory, право, феномен «сложности», методология, synergetic approach, complexity phenomenon, law, теория права, синергетический подход
categories of legal science, научная дискуссия, cultural-historical approach, категории юридической науки, legal life of the society, scientific discussion, methodology, правовая жизнь общества, культурно-исторический подход, legal theory, право, феномен «сложности», методология, synergetic approach, complexity phenomenon, law, теория права, синергетический подход
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
