
arXiv: 2008.05421
In this article, we provide a unified and simplified approach to derandomize central results in the area of fault-tolerant graph algorithms. Given a graph \(G\) , a vertex pair \((s,t)\in V(G)\times V(G)\) , and a set of edge faults \(F\subseteq E(G)\) , a replacement path \(P(s,t,F)\) is an \(s\) - \(t\) shortest path in \(G\setminus F\) . For integer parameters \(L,f\) , a replacement path covering ( \(\mathsf{RPC}\) ) is a collection of subgraphs of \(G\) , denoted by \(\mathcal{G}_{L,f}=\{G_{1},\ldots,G_{r}\}\) , such that for every set \(F\) of at most \(f\) faults (i.e., \(|F|\leq f\) ) and every replacement path \(P(s,t,F)\) of at most \(L\) edges, there exists a subgraph \(G_{i}\in\mathcal{G}_{L,f}\) that contains all the edges of \(P\) and does not contain any of the edges of \(F\) . The covering value of the \(\mathsf{RPC}\) \(\mathcal{G}_{L,f}\) is then defined to be the number of subgraphs in \(\mathcal{G}_{L,f}\) . In the randomized setting, it is easy to build an \((L,f)\) - \(\mathsf{RPC}\) with covering value of \(O(\max\{L,f\}^{\min\{L,f\}}\cdot\min\{L,f\}\cdot \log n)\) , but to this date, there is no efficient deterministic algorithm with matching bounds. As noted recently by Alon et al. (ICALP 2019), this poses the key barrier for derandomizing known constructions of distance sensitivity oracles and fault-tolerant spanners. We show the following: — There exist efficient deterministic constructions of \((L,f)\) - \(\mathsf{RPC}\) s whose covering values almost match the randomized ones, for a wide range of parameters. Our time and value bounds improve considerably over the previous construction of Parter (DISC 2019). Our algorithms are based on the introduction of a novel notion of hash families that we call HM hash families. We then show how to construct these hash families from (algebraic) error correcting codes such as Reed–Solomon codes and Algebraic-Geometric codes. — For every \(L,f\) , and \(n\) , there exists an \(n\) -vertex graph \(G\) whose \((L,f)\) - \(\mathsf{RPC}\) covering value is \(\Omega(L^{f})\) . This lower bound is obtained by exploiting connections to the problem of designing sparse fault-tolerant breadth first search (BFS) structures. An application of our above deterministic constructions is the derandomization of the algebraic construction of the distance sensitivity oracle by Weimann and Yuster (FOCS 2010). The preprocessing and query time of our deterministic algorithm nearly match the randomized bounds. This resolves the open problem of Alon et al. (ICALP 2019). Additionally, we show a derandomization of the randomized construction of vertex fault-tolerant spanners by Dinitz and Krauthgamer (PODC 2011) and Braunschvig et al. (Theor. Comput. Sci., 2015). The time complexity and the size bounds of the output spanners nearly match the randomized counterparts.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, spanners, Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science, Graph algorithms (graph-theoretic aspects), Randomized algorithms, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Analysis of algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), distance sensitivity oracles, fault-tolerant graph algorithms, deterministic algorithms
FOS: Computer and information sciences, spanners, Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science, Graph algorithms (graph-theoretic aspects), Randomized algorithms, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Analysis of algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), distance sensitivity oracles, fault-tolerant graph algorithms, deterministic algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
