
pmid: 11326183
We sought to quantitatively evaluate the evidence on the diagnostic performance of imaging technologies (including rest and stress echocardiography and technetium-99m sestamibi scanning) for the diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia and acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department.We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the English-language literature published between 1966 and December 1998. Both prospective and retrospective studies qualified for the assessment of diagnostic performance. Diagnostic performance was assessed by means of random-effect estimates of test sensitivity, specificity, and the diagnostic odds ratio and was summarized by using summary receiver-operating characteristic curves.Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated in 10 studies of rest echocardiography, 2 studies of dobutamine stress echocardiography, and 6 studies of technetium-99m sestamibi scanning. However, only 3 rest echocardiography and 5 technetium-99m sestamibi studies evaluated patients strictly in the ED setting. Patient populations were often highly selected to represent low- or moderate-risk groups. When limited to ED studies, rest echocardiography showed excellent sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 81% to 97%) and good specificity of 66% (95% CI, 43% to 83%). The results were similar when all studies were considered, including data from reports of admitted patients and patients sent to the cardiac care unit. There was insufficient literature on stress echocardiography in the ED to properly assess the technology. Technetium-99m sestamibi scanning also showed excellent sensitivity (range, 91.5% to 100%) and good specificity (range, 49.3% to 84.4%) for acute myocardial infarction; for acute cardiac ischemia, the random-effects pooled sensitivity was 89% (95% CI, 73% to 96%), and the pooled specificity was 77% (95% CI, 63% to 87%).For selected low- and moderate-risk patient groups, echocardiography and technetium-99m sestamibi imaging appear to have very good diagnostic performance with a similar sensitivity and specificity profile. More evidence should be accumulated on their performance specifically in the ED setting.
Diagnostic Imaging, Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Ischemia, Diagnostic Imaging/*methods/*standards, Sensitivity and Specificity, Bias, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Prevalence, Humans, Prospective Studies, Emergency Treatment, Exercise Test/standards, Retrospective Studies, Evidence-Based Medicine, Myocardial Infarction/*diagnosis/epidemiology, Reproducibility of Results, Echocardiography/standards, *Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Echocardiography, Research Design, Bias (Epidemiology), Acute Disease, Exercise Test, Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi/diagnostic use, Emergency Treatment/*methods/*standards, Myocardial Ischemia/*diagnosis/epidemiology
Diagnostic Imaging, Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Ischemia, Diagnostic Imaging/*methods/*standards, Sensitivity and Specificity, Bias, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Prevalence, Humans, Prospective Studies, Emergency Treatment, Exercise Test/standards, Retrospective Studies, Evidence-Based Medicine, Myocardial Infarction/*diagnosis/epidemiology, Reproducibility of Results, Echocardiography/standards, *Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Echocardiography, Research Design, Bias (Epidemiology), Acute Disease, Exercise Test, Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi/diagnostic use, Emergency Treatment/*methods/*standards, Myocardial Ischemia/*diagnosis/epidemiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
