
The process of colonizing any arthropod species, including vector mosquitoes, necessarily involves adaptation to laboratory conditions. The adaptation and evolution of colonized mosquito populations needs consideration when such colonies are used as representative models for pathogen transmission dynamics. A recently established colony of Anopheles darlingi, the primary malaria vector in Amazonian South America, was tested for genetic diversity and bottleneck after 21 generations, using microsatellites. As expected, laboratory An. darlingi had fewer private and rare alleles (frequency < 0.05), decreased observed heterozygosity, and more common alleles (frequency > 0.50), but no significant evidence of a bottleneck, decrease in total alleles, or increase in inbreeding compared with field specimens (founder population). Low-moderate differentiation between field and laboratory populations was detected. With these findings, and the documented inherent differences between laboratory and field populations, results of pathogen transmission studies using this An. darlingi colony need to be interpreted cautiously.
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.06, Microsatellite Repeats/genetics, Genetic Variation, Anopheles/genetics, Insect Vectors, Malaria, Anopheles, Malaria/transmission, Animals, Inbreeding, Laboratories, Insect Vectors/genetics, Microsatellite Repeats
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.06, Microsatellite Repeats/genetics, Genetic Variation, Anopheles/genetics, Insect Vectors, Malaria, Anopheles, Malaria/transmission, Animals, Inbreeding, Laboratories, Insect Vectors/genetics, Microsatellite Repeats
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
