
arXiv: 2501.06000
Matching objects across partially overlapping camera views is crucial in multi-camera systems and requires a view-invariant feature extraction network. Training such a network with cycle-consistency circumvents the need for labor-intensive labeling. In this paper, we extend the mathematical formulation of cycle-consistency to handle partial overlap. We then introduce a pseudo-mask which directs the training loss to take partial overlap into account. We additionally present several new cycle variants that complement each other and present a time-divergent scene sampling scheme that improves the data input for this self-supervised setting. Cross-camera matching experiments on the challenging DIVOTrack dataset show the merits of our approach. Compared to the self-supervised state-of-the-art, we achieve a 4.3 percentage point higher F1 score with our combined contributions. Our improvements are robust to reduced overlap in the training data, with substantial improvements in challenging scenes that need to make few matches between many people. Self-supervised feature networks trained with our method are effective at matching objects in a range of multi-camera settings, providing opportunities for complex tasks like large-scale multi-camera scene understanding.
Accepted to VISAPP 2025
Multi-camera, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Feature Learning, Cycle-Consistency, Self-Supervision, Multi-Camera, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Feature learning, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cycle-consistency, Cross-View Multi-Object Tracking, Self-supervision, Cross-view multi-object tracking
Multi-camera, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Feature Learning, Cycle-Consistency, Self-Supervision, Multi-Camera, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Feature learning, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cycle-consistency, Cross-View Multi-Object Tracking, Self-supervision, Cross-view multi-object tracking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
