
Advancements in technology have made image forgery increasingly difficult to detect, raising the risk of misinformation on social media. To address this issue, Error Level Analysis (ELA) feature extraction can be utilized to detect error level variations in lossy-formatted images such as JPEG. This study evaluates the contribution of ELA features in classifying authentic and forged images using the MobileNetV2 model. Two scenarios were tested using the CASIA 2.0 dataset: without ELA and with ELA. Fine-tuning was performed to adapt the model to the new problem. Experimental results show that incorporating ELA improves model accuracy up to 93.1%, compared to only 76.41% in the scenario without ELA. Validation using k-fold cross-validation yielded a high average f1-score of 96.83%, confirming the effectiveness of ELA in enhancing the classification performance of authentic and forged images.
classification, fine tuning, k-fold cross validation, error level analysis, mobilenetv2, Information technology, T58.5-58.64, pretrained model
classification, fine tuning, k-fold cross validation, error level analysis, mobilenetv2, Information technology, T58.5-58.64, pretrained model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
