
This study contributes to the evaluation of non-native Spanish speakers’ acoustic production using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, specifically Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models. In order to determine whether leading ASR models can provide adequate feedback on L2 Spanish pronunciation, we evaluated four models (Wav2Vec, Whisper-large-v2, Whisper-large-v3, and SeamlessM4T) using datasets of non-native Spanish speakers with English, Russian, and German as L1s. Based on a Word Error Rate and Character Error Rate evaluation framework, Whisper-large-v3 and SeamlessM4T demonstrated the highest accuracy for non-native speech recognition. A qualitative and phonetic error analysis revealed that these models struggle when vowel formant boundaries of L2 speakers exceed those of standard Spanish or when voiceless consonants are influenced by phonetic assimilation processes. Additionally, we identified gender bias, with models performing better on female speech than male speech, and substitution errors as the most frequent error type. In conclusion, while ASR models like Whisper-large-v3 and SeamlessM4T perform adequately, an accurate pronunciation assessment for L2 Spanish learners requires their outputs to be complemented by a detailed phonetic analysis.
ASR, Phonetics, Spanish L2, Computational linguistics. Natural language processing, P1-1091, Non-native speakers, P98-98.5, Whisper, Philology. Linguistics
ASR, Phonetics, Spanish L2, Computational linguistics. Natural language processing, P1-1091, Non-native speakers, P98-98.5, Whisper, Philology. Linguistics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
