
This paper attempts to induce probability theory (sigma system) and possibility theory (max system) respectively from the clearly-defined randomness and fuzziness, while focusing the question why the key axiom of “maxitivity” is adopted for possibility measure. Such an objective is achieved by following three steps: (a) the establishment of mathematical definitions of randomness and fuzziness; (b) the development of intuitive definition of possibility as measure of fuzziness based on compatibility interpretation; (c) the abstraction of the axiomatic definitions of probability/possibility from their intuitive definitions, by taking advantage of properties of the well-defined randomness and fuzziness. We derived the conclusion that “max” is the only but un-strict disjunctive operator that is applicable across the fuzzy event space, and is an exact operator for extracting the value from the fuzzy sample space that leads to the largest possibility of one. Then a demonstration example of stock price prediction is presented, which confirms that max inference indeed exhibits distinctive performance, with an improvement up to 18.99%, over sigma inference for the investigated application. Our work provides a physical foundation for the axiomatic definition of possibility for the measure of fuzziness, which hopefully would facilitate wider adoption of possibility theory in practice.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Probability (math.PR), FOS: Mathematics, 03B48, 03B52, 60A05, 68T07, Mathematics - Probability, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Probability (math.PR), FOS: Mathematics, 03B48, 03B52, 60A05, 68T07, Mathematics - Probability, Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
