Reinforcement learning is an unsupervised learning algorithm, where learning is based upon feedback from the environment. Prior research has proposed cognitive (e.g., Instance-based Learning or IBL) and statistical (Q-learning) reinforcement learning algorithms. However, an evaluation of these algorithms in a single dynamic environment has not been explored. In this paper, a comparison between the statistical Q-learning algorithm and the cognitive IBL algorithm is presented. A well-known environment, “Frozen Lake,” is used to train, generalize, and scale Q-learning and IBL algorithms. For generalizing, the Q-learning and IBL agents were trained on one version of the Frozen Lake and tested on a permuted version of the same environment. For scaling, the two algorithms were tested on a larger version of the Frozen Lake environment. Results revealed that the IBL algorithm used less training time and generalized better to different environment variants. The IBL algorithm was also able to show scalability by retaining its superior performance in the larger environment. These results indicate that the IBL algorithm could be proposed as an alternative to the standard reinforcement learning algorithms based on dynamic programming such as Q-learning. The inclusion of human factors (such as memory) in the IBL algorithm makes it suitable for robust learning in complex and dynamic environments.