Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Endodo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Endodontic Journal
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
HKU Scholars Hub
Article . 2012
Data sources: HKU Scholars Hub
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post‐and‐core systems in a specialist practice setting

Authors: Joss, A; Salvi, GE; Lang, NP; Guldener, BES; Amstad, T;

Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post‐and‐core systems in a specialist practice setting

Abstract

AbstractAim  To assess survival rates and complications of root‐filled teeth restored with or without post‐and‐core systems over a mean observation period of ≥4 years.Methodology  A total of 325 single‐ and multirooted teeth in 183 subjects treated in a private practice were root filled and restored with either a cast post‐and‐core or with a prefabricated titanium post and composite core. Root‐filled teeth without post‐retained restorations served as controls. The restored teeth served as abutments for single unit metal‐ceramic or composite crowns or fixed bridges. Teeth supporting cantilever bridges, overdentures or telescopic crowns were excluded.Results  Seventeen teeth in 17 subjects were lost to follow‐up (17/325: 5.2%). The mean observation period was 5.2 ± 1.8 (SD) years for restorations with titanium posts, 6.2 ± 2.0 (SD) years for cast post‐and‐cores and 4.4 ± 1.7 (SD) years for teeth without posts. Overall, 54% of build‐ups included the incorporation of a titanium post and 26.5% the cementation of a cast post‐and‐core. The remaining 19.5% of the teeth were restored without intraradicular retention. The adjusted 5‐year tooth survival rate amounted to 92.5% for teeth restored with titanium posts, to 97.1% for teeth restored with cast post‐and‐cores and to 94.3% for teeth without post restorations, respectively. The most frequent complications included root fracture (6.2%), recurrent caries (1.9%), post‐treatment periradicular disease (1.6%) and loss of retention (1.3%).Conclusion  Provided that high‐quality root canal treatment and restorative protocols are implemented, high survival and low complication rates of single‐ and multirooted root‐filled teeth used as abutments for fixed restorations can be expected after a mean observation period of ≥4 years.

Country
China (People's Republic of)
Related Organizations
Keywords

670, Dental Abutments, Dental Restoration, Permanent - Instrumentation, Composite Resins, Endodontics, Fixed, Nonvital - Therapy, Humans, Dental Restoration Failure, Prospective Studies, Post And Core Technique, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Titanium, Tooth, Nonvital, Dental Casting Technique, Crowns, Denture, Root Canal Therapy, Dental Restoration, Permanent - Instrumentation, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Gold Alloys, Tooth, Nonvital - Therapy, Tooth, Partial, Dental Alloys, Post and Core Technique

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    71
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
71
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!