Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Paediatric and Perin...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Recommendations for Improving Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies in Europe Using Healthcare Databases

Authors: Maria Loane; Joan K. Morris; Ester Garne;

Recommendations for Improving Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies in Europe Using Healthcare Databases

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundAlthough accessing administrative data in healthcare databases may be a more time‐efficient and cost‐effective method of conducting surveillance, there is evidence suggesting that administrative data alone are not sufficient for population‐based surveillance of congenital anomalies.ObjectiveTo propose recommendations to maximise the potential use of healthcare databases for surveillance of congenital anomalies based on our data linkage experiences and results from the EUROlinkCAT study.MethodsEUROlinkCAT is a population‐based cohort study of 99,416 children with anomalies born between 1995 and 2014. The congenital anomaly case records of children in 11 European congenital anomaly (EUROCAT) registries (eight countries) were linked to standardised administrative healthcare data (birth records, death records and hospital discharge records) to evaluate mortality and morbidity outcomes in these children. Overall, 97% of children with anomalies were successfully matched to their records in their national or regional administrative databases. Recommendations to improve surveillance of anomalies when using healthcare data were developed through establishing and analysing data from this cohort.ResultsThe primary recommendation is to develop systems to report anomalies diagnosed in foetuses who undergo a termination and link these data to their mothers. Each liveborn baby must be assigned a permanent unique identification number at birth to enable accurate linkage across healthcare databases. Implementing and improving existing algorithms to discriminate between major anomalies and suspected or minor anomalies will improve accuracy in coding. Heterogeneity in coding anomalies will improve by avoiding the use of ‘unspecified’ or ‘other specified’ codes in hospital databases. Relaxation of country‐specific regulations concerning the suppression of small numbers are necessary to enable data to be combined across European countries.ConclusionImplementation of these recommendations will enable the information in electronic healthcare databases, in conjunction with Congenital Anomaly registries, to be fully exploited and hence will improve the surveillance of anomalies in children.

Keywords

Male, Databases, Factual, congenital anomalies, Infant, Newborn, Infant, healthcare databases, Newborn, Congenital Anomalies, Europe/epidemiology, Congenital Abnormalities, Population Surveillance/methods, Europe, Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology, Databases, quality, Pregnancy, Population Surveillance, recommendations, surveillance, Humans, Female, Registries, linkage, Factual

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities