
Summary: The random-adversary technique is a general method for proving lower bounds on randomized parallel algorithms. The bounds apply to the number of communication steps, and they apply regardless of the processors' instruction sets, the lengths of messages, etc. This paper introduces the random-adversary technique and shows how it can be used to obtain lower bounds on randomized parallel algorithms for load balancing, compaction, padded sorting, and finding Hamiltonian cycles in random graphs. Using the random-adversary technique, we obtain the first lower bounds for randomized parallel algorithms which are provably faster than their deterministic counterparts (specifically, for load balancing and related problems).
expected time, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, load balancing, parallel algorithms, Modes of computation (nondeterministic, parallel, interactive, probabilistic, etc.), randomized parallel algorithms, lower bounds, PRAM model, Distributed algorithms, parallel computation
expected time, Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity, load balancing, parallel algorithms, Modes of computation (nondeterministic, parallel, interactive, probabilistic, etc.), randomized parallel algorithms, lower bounds, PRAM model, Distributed algorithms, parallel computation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
