Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Патология кровообращ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Early results of surgery for aortic valve disease in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

Authors: S. Babeshko; Yu. Samurganov; D. Shumkov; K. Barbukhatti; V. Porkhanov;

Early results of surgery for aortic valve disease in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

Abstract

Aim. This study aimed to analyse the early results of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: i.e. a left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30%.Methods. This retrospective study included 145 adult patients with isolated aortic valve disease and LVEF ≤30% who underwent aortic valve replacement from 2005 to 2019 at our institution. Patients who required any concomitant or redo surgery were excluded from the study.Results. There were three perioperative deaths (in-hospital mortality, 2.1%) due to multiple organ failure syndrome (two patients) or acute heart failure (one patient). Postoperative heart failure was the prevailing non-lethal complication (73% of cases). Other complications occurred less frequently: nine patients (6.2%) had acute kidney injury (four of whom required hemodiafiltration), one patient (0.7%) suffered a stroke, six patients (4%) required chest re-exploration for bleeding and two patients (1.4%) experienced sternal infection of the surgical wound. Patient LVEF improved significantly from 22.6% ± 5.3% to 35.8% ± 11.0% postoperatively (a 37% mean increase; p = 0.02), and most patients (73%) were classified as New York Heart Association class I–II by the time of discharge.Conclusion. Our study showed excellent results of surgery for aortic valve disease in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Postoperatively, there was a marked increase in LVEF and significant clinical improvement. Received 1 May 2020. Revised 12 May 2020. Accepted 18 May 2020. Funding: The study did not have sponsorship. Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest. Author contributionsConception and design: S.S. Babeshko, K.O. Barbukhatti, V.A. PorkhanovData collection and analysis: S.S. Babeshko, D.I. ShumkovDrafting the article: S.S. Babeshko, Y.P. SamurganovStatistical analysis: S.S. Babeshko, D.I. ShumkovCritical revision of the article: S.S. Babeshko, Y.P. Samurganov, K.O. BarbukhattiFinal approval of the version to be published: S.S. Babeshko, Y.P. Samurganov, D.I. Shumkov, K.O. Barbukhatti, V.A. Porkhanov

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities