
Abstract Copy number variation (CNV) is a crucial biomarker for many complex traits and diseases. Although numerous CNV detection tools are available, no single method consistently achieves optimal performance across diverse sequencing samples, as each tool has distinct advantages and limitations. Therefore, integrating the strengths of these tools to improve CNV detection accuracy is both a promising strategy and a significant challenge. To address this, we propose EMcnv, a novel deep ensemble framework based on meta-learning. EMcnv combines multiple CNV detection strategies through a three-step approach: (i) leveraging meta-learning and meta-path heterogeneous graphs, employing Relational Graph Convolutional Networks as a specific model within the Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks framework to develop a probabilistic weight meta-model that ensembles various CNV detection strategies; (ii) assigning probabilistic weights to calls from different CNV detection tools and aggregating them into weighted CNV regions (CNVRs); (iii) refining Copy number variations based on weighted CNVRs. We conducted comprehensive experiments on both simulated and real sequencing data using benchmark datasets. The results demonstrate that EMcnv significantly outperforms popular existing methods, underscoring its superiority and importance in CNV detection. To support further research, the source code is available for academic use at https://github.com/Sherwin-xjtu/EMcnv.
DNA Copy Number Variations, Problem Solving Protocol, Humans, Computational Biology, Neural Networks, Computer, Algorithms
DNA Copy Number Variations, Problem Solving Protocol, Humans, Computational Biology, Neural Networks, Computer, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
