Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Digitala Vetenskapli...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.23988/sats....
Part of book or chapter of book . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Knowledge Contributions from Different School Subjects to Cross-Curricular Didactics for Bildung and Sustainability

Authors: Sjöström, Jesper; Economou, Catarina; Edström, Ann-Mari; Ekberg, Jan-Eric; Svensson Källberg, Petra; Larneby, Marie; Liljefors Persson, Bodil; +4 Authors

Knowledge Contributions from Different School Subjects to Cross-Curricular Didactics for Bildung and Sustainability

Abstract

In the context of humanistic Bildung-centred Didaktik, the educational potential of different school subjects is emphasized. But how can different school subjects collectively contribute to the ‘cultivation-of-human-powers’ and Bildung with a focus on sustainability? In this article, seven different school subjects are compared. Eleven teacher educators from Malmö University, Sweden, have written scholarly about the roles of their respective school subjects for Bildung and sustainability. Drawing from the texts related to the seven school subjects – geography, mathematics, physical education and health, religious education, science for citizenship, Swedish as a second language, and visual arts – a comparative analysis was conducted. The primary focus was to understand the unique characteristics of each school subject, explore their epistemic differences, and discern their potential roles in fostering cross-curricular didactics for Bildung and sustainability. It is shown that the different school subjects collectively provide complementary contributions to contemporary Bildung and climate change literacy.

Keywords

knowledge, citizenship, språk, curriculum, powerful subject knowings, subject didactics, geography, competences, second language, curriculum subject, didaktik, Anthropocene, cross-curricular didactics, ämnesövergripande, idrott, skolämnen, naturkunskap, bildningskategorier, mathematics, comparative, wicked problems, socio-scientific issues, action competence, Bildung dimension, L2, Didaktik, science studies, sustainability, physical education, school subject, idrott och hälsa, didactics, climate change literacv, religious education, klimatundervisning, cross-curricular, language education, knowings, hållbarhet, 370, visual arts, bild, religionskunskap, contemporary Bildung, material Bildung, subject education, critical literacy, innehåll, allmänbildning, general subject didactics, kunskap, educational content, capabilities, content, climate change education, geografi, allmän ämnesdidaktik, transformation, skolämne, Didactics, tvärvetenskap, disciplinary literacy, science for citizenship, future literacy, epistemic, bildning, knowledge contribution, interdisciplinary, agency, ämnesdidaktik, matematik, svenska som andraspråk, kunskapsbidrag, secondary school, formal Bildung, science education, Bildung, scientific literacy, ämnesundervisning, Klafki

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Green
bronze
Related to Research communities