
doi: 10.1292/jvms.63.567
pmid: 11411506
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was developed for directly typing porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) from lung specimens without virus isolation. Twenty nine lung specimens collected from postweaning pigs were isolated for PRRSV. When the PCR products from the 29 lung specimens were digested by the restriction enzymes MluI, HincII, SacII and HaeIII, the RFLP patterns from the 29 lung specimens matched with those from the corresponding PRRSV isolates from each pig. The results suggest that the PCR-based RFLP analysis method may be useful to distinguish PRRSV isolates directly from lung specimens without virus isolation.
DNA, Complementary, Korea, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Swine, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Sensitivity and Specificity, Animals, RNA, Viral, Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus, Lung, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
DNA, Complementary, Korea, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Swine, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Sensitivity and Specificity, Animals, RNA, Viral, Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus, Lung, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
