
handle: 10138/594436
Abstract Public support for addressing the sustainability crisis is crucial for mainstreaming environmental issues into policymaking. Recently, escalating impacts of an energy crisis have sparked debates over European energy governance, influencing policymaking on climate and biodiversity goals. Understanding how public attention towards climate and biodiversity is mediated by social media during crises can provide insights into the processes of public opinion formation. We investigated the attention patterns, narrative shifts, and sentiment regarding climate and biodiversity concerning European energy governance on X (formerly Twitter), between 2021 and 2023. We employed the issue–attention cycle framework and combined quantitative methods with qualitative thematic analysis. We found limited attention on climate and biodiversity in European energy governance, suggesting low engagement with the interconnected dimensions of the crisis. Climate and biodiversity issues were mainly linked to energy governance in relation to the transition from fossil fuels to renewables. Attention fluctuated over time following three waves of salient themes: the unfolding energy crisis, geopolitical instability, and socio-economic concerns. Geopolitical events elicited a sense of urgency for accelerating the energy transition. However, socio-economic events (high energy prices) aroused critical views towards the transition, reflecting emerging discourses against decarbonization in the EU. Limited attention to climate and biodiversity on social media may reinforce the perception that these issues are unrelated to energy governance, driving public support towards uncoordinated, even contradictory, sectorial policies. The construction of saliency around polarized framing on social media may push opinions against environmental policies on energy governance, challenging the reconciliation of environmental, economic, and social imperatives of sustainability.
ilmastokriisi, Climate, social media, Issue-attention cycle, issue-attention cycle, School of Resource Wisdom, sosiaalinen media, yleinen mielipide, NLP, Resurssiviisausyhteisö, Sensemaking, ilmasto, natural language processing, Energy transition, Environmental governance, mixed-methods, Mixed-methods, kestävä kehitys, sensemaking, environmental governance, Biodiversity, biodiversiteetti, energy transition, Sustainability, kestävyys, energiantuotanto, Geosciences
ilmastokriisi, Climate, social media, Issue-attention cycle, issue-attention cycle, School of Resource Wisdom, sosiaalinen media, yleinen mielipide, NLP, Resurssiviisausyhteisö, Sensemaking, ilmasto, natural language processing, Energy transition, Environmental governance, mixed-methods, Mixed-methods, kestävä kehitys, sensemaking, environmental governance, Biodiversity, biodiversiteetti, energy transition, Sustainability, kestävyys, energiantuotanto, Geosciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
