
Summary In the presence of sample selection, Lee’s (2009, Review of Economic Studies 76, 1071–102) non-parametric bounds are a popular tool for estimating a treatment effect. However, the Lee bounds rely on the monotonicity assumption, the empirical validity of which is sometimes unclear. Furthermore, the bounds are often regarded to be wide and less informative even under monotonicity. To address these issues, this study introduces a stochastic version of the monotonicity assumption alongside a non-parametric distributional shape constraint. The former enhances the robustness of the Lee bounds with respect to monotonicity, while the latter helps tighten these bounds. The obtained bounds do not rely on the exclusion restriction and can be root-n consistently estimable, making them practically viable. The potential usefulness of the proposed methods is illustrated by their application to experimental data from an after-school instruction programme.
FOS: Economics and business, Econometrics (econ.EM), Economics - Econometrics
FOS: Economics and business, Econometrics (econ.EM), Economics - Econometrics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
