
doi: 10.1118/1.3469015
Purpose: As a part of developing treatment planning system, auto‐optimization method was designed to determine photon energy spectrum and the shape of dose profile with various field sizes.Method and Materials: The initial distribution of energy spectrum was designed using approximate formulation. Multi‐spectrum kernels were constructed with the determine photon energy fluence using published mono‐energy kernel, and collapse cone convolution algorithm was implemented to calculate PDDs and dose profiles by considering the effects of beam hardening with depth, kernel tilting, beam softening with off axis distance, off axis ratio, and finite beam source size. Objective function was defined with the sums of differences between measured PDD or dose profiles and calculated PDD or dose profiles. Auto‐optimization method based on steepest decent method was used to minimize objective function by calculating gradient values at each iteration.Results: Determined energy spectrums were not similar to rear photon spectrums, but calculated PDDs showed good agreements with measured data. The dose error beyond build‐up depth was less than 2 % at any depth. Some under‐estimated results (>5%) were showed at the buildup regions ( 30 x30 cm2) because not considering electron contamination. Calculated dose profiles were also well agreed with measured dose profiles (<3% errors) up to 10×10 cm2, but some discrepancies at penumbra region were appeared at large field. Conclusion: Determined energy spectrums of photon beam with various field sizes were useful to simulate the variation of PDDs. Multi‐spectrum model with field sizes based on auto‐optimization was good approximated method to simulate measured dose distribution, and it seemed to compensate the limitation of classical convolution/superposition algorithm using finite radius of kernel.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
