
This study aims to systematically review the recommendations of theses focusing on music departments in Turkish FAHS. The study is considered unique and significant for examining the needs of FAHS music education from a different perspective. The research employed a systematic literature review method. A systematic literature review is a structured and comprehensive synthesis of numerous studies using similar methods to identify the most robust available research evidence by experts in the field. The research data sources are the theses on music education in FAHS published in the database of the National Thesis Center of the Council of Higher Education (CoHE) between 2005 and 2023. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, 159 theses were interpreted by content analysis. It was determined that under the education theme of the theses examined; school, course, material and equipment, student, curriculum, and teacher dimensions were presented. In the discussion section, the codes regarding these dimensions were analyzed and interpreted. When the recommendations were analyzed according to the codes, it was determined that the majority covered issues that should be resolved by the Ministry of National Education (MoNE). Additionally, there are recommendations for the principals and teachers working in FAHS. It is essential that these stakeholders should address and resolve the issues to improve the efficiency of education and increase academic success.
Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme (Diğer), Measurement and Evaluation in Education (Other), Fine arts high school;Music department;Systematic literature review
Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme (Diğer), Measurement and Evaluation in Education (Other), Fine arts high school;Music department;Systematic literature review
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
