
doi: 10.3233/fi-2018-1696
handle: 11585/636688 , 11582/316150
The capability to store data about Business Process (BP) executions in so-called Event Logs has brought to the identification of a range of key reasoning services (consistency, compliance, runtime monitoring, prediction) for the analysis of process executions and process models. Tools for the provision of these services typically focus on one form of reasoning alone. Moreover, they are often very rigid in dealing with forms of incomplete information about the process execution. While this enables the development of ad hoc solutions, it also poses an obstacle for the adoption of reasoning-based solutions in the BP community. In this paper, we introduce the notion of Structured Processes with Observability and Time (SPOT models), able to support incompleteness (of traces and logs), and temporal constraints on the activity duration and between activities. Then, we exploit the power of abduction to provide a flexible, yet computationally effective framework able to reinterpret key reasoning services in terms of incompleteness and observability in a uniform way.
Business Processes, Incomplete traces, Observability, Temporal workflows, Abductive Logic Programming, temporal workflows, observability, Models and methods for concurrent and distributed computing (process algebras, bisimulation, transition nets, etc.), business processes, Theory of organizations, manpower planning in operations research, incomplete traces, abductive logic programming, Logic programming, 004
Business Processes, Incomplete traces, Observability, Temporal workflows, Abductive Logic Programming, temporal workflows, observability, Models and methods for concurrent and distributed computing (process algebras, bisimulation, transition nets, etc.), business processes, Theory of organizations, manpower planning in operations research, incomplete traces, abductive logic programming, Logic programming, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
