
pmid: 38489369
arXiv: 2212.08678
It is unclear to what extent quantum algorithms can outperform classical algorithms for problems of combinatorial optimization. In this work, by resorting to computational learning theory and cryptographic notions, we give a fully constructive proof that quantum computers feature a super-polynomial advantage over classical computers in approximating combinatorial optimization problems. Specifically, by building on seminal work by Kearns and Valiant, we provide special instances that are hard for classical computers to approximate up to polynomial factors. Simultaneously, we give a quantum algorithm that can efficiently approximate the optimal solution within a polynomial factor. The quantum advantage in this work is ultimately borrowed from Shor’s quantum algorithm for factoring. We introduce an explicit and comprehensive end-to-end construction for the advantage bearing instances. For these instances, quantum computers have, in principle, the power to approximate combinatorial optimization solutions beyond the reach of classical efficient algorithms.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::530 Physik::530 Physik, FOS: Physical sciences, Computational Complexity (cs.CC), 530, Condensed Matter - Other Condensed Matter, Computer Science - Computational Complexity, classical algorithms, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), quantum algorithms, problems of combinatorial optimization, Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::530 Physik::530 Physik, FOS: Physical sciences, Computational Complexity (cs.CC), 530, Condensed Matter - Other Condensed Matter, Computer Science - Computational Complexity, classical algorithms, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), quantum algorithms, problems of combinatorial optimization, Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
