
This study aims to classify cognitive workload levels from EEG signals. EEG signals from 48 subjects under resting and task cognitive load conditions were analyzed. Noise and artifacts were removed by applying band-pass and notch filtering methods in the 1-50 Hz band on the EEG data. Then, the EEG data were segmented with the windowing technique in 256 and 512 sample sizes, and a total of 309 features based on time, frequency, and complexity were extracted. Using the obtained feature set, logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), random forest (RF), XGBoost machine learning (ML) algorithms and deep neural networks (DNN), one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning (DL) methods were applied for multi-class classification. In the experimental results, the highest success was obtained in the XGBoost model with a 99.4% accuracy rate and 0.990 Cohen’s kappa value, and in DL methods, a 98.75% accuracy rate and 0.981 Kappa value in the LSTM model. This study reveals that integrating multidimensional features obtained from EEG signals with both ML algorithms and DL models provides high accuracy in cognitive workload classification.
Biyomedikal Bilimler ve Teknolojiler, Biomedical Diagnosis, Biomedical Sciences and Technology, EEG;Cognitive Workload;Machine Learning;Deep Learning;Feature Extraction;Biomedical., Reinforcement Learning, Pekiştirmeli Öğrenme, EEG;Kognitif İş Yükü;Makine Öğrenmesi;Derin Öğrenme;Özellik Çıkarımı;Biyomedikal., Biyomedikal Tanı
Biyomedikal Bilimler ve Teknolojiler, Biomedical Diagnosis, Biomedical Sciences and Technology, EEG;Cognitive Workload;Machine Learning;Deep Learning;Feature Extraction;Biomedical., Reinforcement Learning, Pekiştirmeli Öğrenme, EEG;Kognitif İş Yükü;Makine Öğrenmesi;Derin Öğrenme;Özellik Çıkarımı;Biyomedikal., Biyomedikal Tanı
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
