
arXiv: 2003.02144
handle: 21.11116/0000-0007-93BF-C , 11565/4060543 , 11565/4041704
Machine-learned predictors, although achieving very good results for inputs resembling training data, cannot possibly provide perfect predictions in all situations. Still, decision-making systems that are based on such predictors need not only benefit from good predictions, but should also achieve a decent performance when the predictions are inadequate. In this article, we propose a prediction setup for arbitrary metrical task systems (MTS) (e.g., caching , k -server, and convex body chasing ) and online matching on the line . We utilize results from the theory of online algorithms to show how to make the setup robust. Specifically, for caching, we present an algorithm whose performance, as a function of the prediction error, is exponentially better than what is achievable for general MTS. Finally, we present an empirical evaluation of our methods on real-world datasets, which suggests practicality.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Online algorithms, Metrical task systems, [INFO] Computer Science [cs], Computer science, Computing methodologies, metrical task systems, ML AUGMENTED ALGORITHMS, METRICAL TASK SYSTEMS, CACHING, caching, CACHING, COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS, METRICAL TASK SYSTEMS, Machine learning, 2023 OA procedure, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, [INFO]Computer Science [cs], competitive analysis, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), Theory of computation
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Online algorithms, Metrical task systems, [INFO] Computer Science [cs], Computer science, Computing methodologies, metrical task systems, ML AUGMENTED ALGORITHMS, METRICAL TASK SYSTEMS, CACHING, caching, CACHING, COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS, METRICAL TASK SYSTEMS, Machine learning, 2023 OA procedure, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, [INFO]Computer Science [cs], competitive analysis, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), Theory of computation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
