
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.785
pmid: 32511838
AbstractBackgroundThe prevalent location and incidence of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) and invasive carcinoma associated with them have varied markedly among studies due to differences in diagnostic criteria and tumor location.MethodsIPNBs were classified into two types: Type 1 IPNB, being histologically similar to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, and Type 2 IPNB, having a more complex histological architecture with irregular papillary branching or foci of solid‐tubular components. Medical data were evaluated.ResultsAmong 694 IPNB patients, 520 and 174 had Type 1 and Type 2, respectively. The levels of AST, ALT, ALP, T. Bil, and CEA were significantly higher in patients with Type 2 than in those with Type 1. Type 1 IPNB was more frequently located in the intrahepatic bile duct than Type 2, whereas Type 2 was more frequently located in the distal bile duct than Type 1 IPNB (P < 0.001). There were significant differences in 5‐year cumulative survival rates (75.2% vs 50.9%; P < 0.0001) and 5‐year cumulative disease‐free survival rates (64.1% vs 35.3%; P < 0.0001) between the two groups.ConclusionType 1 and Type 2 IPNBs differ in their clinicopathological features and prognosis. This classification may help to further understand IPNB.
Intrahepatic, 610, preinvasive carcinoma, Bile Duct Neoplasms* / epidemiology, Bile Duct Neoplasms* / surgery, Japan / epidemiology, intraepithelial neoplasm, Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Japan, Republic of Korea, Humans, biliary tract neoplasm, Bile Ducts, cholangiocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas
Intrahepatic, 610, preinvasive carcinoma, Bile Duct Neoplasms* / epidemiology, Bile Duct Neoplasms* / surgery, Japan / epidemiology, intraepithelial neoplasm, Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Japan, Republic of Korea, Humans, biliary tract neoplasm, Bile Ducts, cholangiocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
