Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1049/rsn2.12249
Abstract Continuous Human Activity Recognition (HAR) in arbitrary directions is investigated in this paper using a network of five spatially distributed pulsed Ultra‐Wideband radars. While activities performed continuously and in unconstrained trajectories provide a more realistic and natural scenario for HAR, the network of radar sensors is proposed to address the issue of unfavourable or occluded perspectives when using only a single sensor. Different techniques to combine the relevant information from the multiple radars in the network are investigated, focussing on signal level fusion directly applied on Range‐Time maps, and the selection of radar nodes based on location and velocity of the target derived from multilateration processing and tracking. Recurrent Neural Networks with and without bidirectionality are used to classify the activities based on the micro‐Doppler (μD) spectrograms obtained for sensor fusion techniques. To assess classification performances, novel evaluation metrics accounting for the continuous nature of the sequence of activities and inherent imbalances in the dataset are proposed and compared with existing metrics. It is shown that the conventional accuracy metric may not capture all the important aspects for continuous HAR, and the proposed metrics can be considered for a more comprehensive evaluation.
signal classification, OA-Fund TU Delft, radar target recognition, distributed sensors, micro Doppler, Telecommunication, 006, TK5101-6720, ultra wideband radar, radar tracking
signal classification, OA-Fund TU Delft, radar target recognition, distributed sensors, micro Doppler, Telecommunication, 006, TK5101-6720, ultra wideband radar, radar tracking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 14 | |
| downloads | 34 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts