
AbstractPurposeAngiostatic agents have proven effective in the treatment of macular oedema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). However, treatment is inconvenient and expensive, and novel treatment regimens are warranted. We aimed to evaluate if combination treatment of navigated central retinal laser and aflibercept lowered the treatment burden in these patients.MethodsTreatment‐naïve patients with BRVO and macular oedema were included at two centres and randomized 1:1 to three monthly injections of 2.0 mg aflibercept with (Group A) or without (Group B) navigated central laser, followed by aflibercept as needed from month 4 through 12. Re‐treatment need was evaluated, and secondary endpoints included functional and anatomical outcomes and safety evaluated by retinal microperimetry.ResultsWe evaluated 41 eyes of 41 patients with a mean age of 69.6 years. Baseline median best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 70.0 letters, and median central retinal thickness (CRT) was 502 μm with no difference between Groups A (n = 21) and B (n = 20). Percentage of patients needing re‐treatment after month three was 71% and 80% (p = 0.72). At month 12, groups did not differ in number of injections after loading (1 versus 2, p = 0.43), change in BCVA (+12.8 versus +15.1 letters, p = 0.48), CRT (−195 versus −181 μm, p = 0.82), or retinal sensitivity (+3.3 versus +4.1 dB, p = 0.67).ConclusionIn treatment‐naïve BRVO patients, addition of navigated central laser to aflibercept did not lower treatment burden or affect functional or anatomical outcomes. A low number of intravitreal injections were needed for successful outcome in both treatment arms.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Lasers, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Visual Acuity, 610, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Original Articles, Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use, Macular Edema, Macular Edema/diagnosis, Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Treatment Outcome, Retinal Vein Occlusion/diagnosis, Receptors, Intravitreal Injections, Retinal Vein Occlusion, Humans, Aged
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Lasers, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Visual Acuity, 610, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Original Articles, Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use, Macular Edema, Macular Edema/diagnosis, Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Treatment Outcome, Retinal Vein Occlusion/diagnosis, Receptors, Intravitreal Injections, Retinal Vein Occlusion, Humans, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
