Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this paper, we introduce the notion of Cooperative Perception Error Models (coPEMs) towards achieving an effective and efficient integration of V2X solutions within a virtual test environment. We focus our analysis on the occlusion problem in the (onboard) perception of Autonomous Vehicles (AV), which can manifest as misdetection errors on the occluded objects. Cooperative perception (CP) solutions based on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communications aim to avoid such issues by cooperatively leveraging additional points of view for the world around the AV. This approach usually requires many sensors, mainly cameras and LiDARs, to be deployed simultaneously in the environment either as part of the road infrastructure or on other traffic vehicles. However, implementing a large number of sensor models in a virtual simulation pipeline is often prohibitively computationally expensive. Therefore, in this paper, we rely on extending Perception Error Models (PEMs) to efficiently implement such cooperative perception solutions along with the errors and uncertainties associated with them. We demonstrate the approach by comparing the safety achievable by an AV challenged with a traffic scenario where occlusion is the primary cause of a potential collision.
Accepted at 2022 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems - ITSC2022 6 pages, 6 figures
I.2, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, C.4, I.6, :Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Simulation and modeling [Engineering], Autonomous Vehicles, Virtual Testing, Computer Science - Robotics, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Robotics (cs.RO), C.4; I.2; I.6
I.2, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, C.4, I.6, :Computer science and engineering::Computing methodologies::Simulation and modeling [Engineering], Autonomous Vehicles, Virtual Testing, Computer Science - Robotics, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Robotics (cs.RO), C.4; I.2; I.6
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts