
AbstractRisk factors for prediction of prognosis in meningiomas derivable from routine preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) remain elusive. Correlations of tumor and edema volume, disruption of the arachnoid layer, heterogeneity of contrast enhancement, enhancement of the capsule, T2-intensity, tumor shape, and calcifications on pMRI with tumor recurrence and high-grade (WHO grade II/III) histology were analyzed in 565 patients who underwent surgery for WHO grade I (N = 516, 91%) or II/III (high-grade histology, N = 49, 9%) meningioma between 1991 and 2018. Edema volume (OR, 1.00; p = 0.003), heterogeneous contrast enhancement (OR, 3.10; p < 0.001), and an irregular shape (OR, 2.16; p = 0.015) were associated with high-grade histology. Multivariate analyses confirmed edema volume (OR, 1.00; p = 0.037) and heterogeneous contrast enhancement (OR, 2.51; p = 0.014) as risk factors for high-grade histology. Tumor volume (HR, 1.01; p = 0.045), disruption of the arachnoid layer (HR, 2.50; p = 0.003), heterogeneous contrast enhancement (HR, 2.05; p = 0.007), and an irregular tumor shape (HR, 2.57; p = 0.001) were correlated with recurrence. Multivariate analyses confirmed tumor volume (HR, 1.01; p = 0.032) and disruption of the arachnoid layer (HR, 2.44; p = 0.013) as risk factors for recurrence, independent of histology. Subgroup analyses revealed disruption of the arachnoid layer (HR, 9.41; p < 0.001) as a stronger risk factor for recurrence than high-grade histology (HR, 5.15; p = 0.001). Routine pMRI contains relevant information about the risk of recurrence or high-grade histology of meningioma patients. Loss of integrity of the arachnoid layer on MRI had a higher prognostic value than the WHO grading, and underlying histological or molecular alterations remain to be determined.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Postoperative Care, Adolescent, Brain Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Aged, 80 and over [MeSH] ; Recurrence ; Aged [MeSH] ; Postoperative Care/methods [MeSH] ; Brain Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Risk Factors [MeSH] ; MRI ; Preoperative Care/methods [MeSH] ; Original Article ; Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Meningioma/surgery [MeSH] ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Child [MeSH] ; Meningiomas ; Adolescent [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Tumor Burden/physiology [MeSH] ; Follow-Up Studies [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Prognosis [MeSH] ; WHO grade ; Young Adult [MeSH] ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods [MeSH] ; Neoplasm Grading/methods [MeSH] ; Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Meningioma/diagnostic imaging [MeSH], Risk Factors, Preoperative Care, Meningeal Neoplasms, Humans, Original Article, Female, Neoplasm Grading, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Child, Meningioma, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Postoperative Care, Adolescent, Brain Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Aged, 80 and over [MeSH] ; Recurrence ; Aged [MeSH] ; Postoperative Care/methods [MeSH] ; Brain Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Risk Factors [MeSH] ; MRI ; Preoperative Care/methods [MeSH] ; Original Article ; Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Meningioma/surgery [MeSH] ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Child [MeSH] ; Meningiomas ; Adolescent [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Tumor Burden/physiology [MeSH] ; Follow-Up Studies [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Prognosis [MeSH] ; WHO grade ; Young Adult [MeSH] ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods [MeSH] ; Neoplasm Grading/methods [MeSH] ; Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Meningioma/diagnostic imaging [MeSH], Risk Factors, Preoperative Care, Meningeal Neoplasms, Humans, Original Article, Female, Neoplasm Grading, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Child, Meningioma, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
