
doi: 10.3233/shti250585
pmid: 40380690
Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed medical diagnostics by enhancing the accuracy of disease detection, particularly through deep learning models to analyze medical imaging data. However, the energy demands of training these models, such as ResNet and MobileNet, are substantial and often overlooked; however, researchers mainly focus on improving model accuracy. This study compares the energy use of these two models for classifying thoracic diseases using the well-known CheXpert dataset. We calculate power and energy consumption during training using the EnergyEfficientAI library. Results demonstrate that MobileNet outperforms ResNet by consuming less power and completing training faster, resulting in lower overall energy costs. This study highlights the importance of prioritizing energy efficiency in AI model development, promoting sustainable, eco-friendly approaches to advance medical diagnosis.
Energy-efficient AI, Green AI, Artificial Intelligence (AI), MobileNet, Machine learning (ML), Medical diagnostics, ResNet, Energy consumption, Deep Learning, Sustainability, Artificial Intelligence, CheXpert dataset, Deep learning (DL), Power efficiency, Humans, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
Energy-efficient AI, Green AI, Artificial Intelligence (AI), MobileNet, Machine learning (ML), Medical diagnostics, ResNet, Energy consumption, Deep Learning, Sustainability, Artificial Intelligence, CheXpert dataset, Deep learning (DL), Power efficiency, Humans, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
