Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Abstract Independent component analysis (ICA) is one of the leading approaches for studying brain functional networks. There is increasing interest in neuroscience studies to investigate individual differences in brain networks and their association with demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes. In this work, we develop a sparse Bayesian group hierarchical ICA model that offers significant improvements over existing ICA techniques for identifying covariate effects on the brain network. Specifically, we model the population-level ICA source signals for brain networks using a Dirichlet process mixture. To reliably capture individual differences on brain networks, we propose sparse estimation of the covariate effects in the hierarchical ICA model via a horseshoe prior. Through extensive simulation studies, we show that our approach performs considerably better in detecting covariate effects in comparison with the leading group ICA methods. We then perform an ICA decomposition of a between-subject meditation study. Our method is able to identify significant effects related to meditative practice in brain regions that are consistent with previous research into the default mode network, whereas other group ICA approaches find few to no effects.
Brain Mapping, Individuality, Humans, Brain, Bayes Theorem, blind source separation; hierarchical independent component analysis; individual network differences; neuroimaging data analysis; reliable estimation of covariate effects on brain networks; sparse Bayesian ICA model, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain Mapping, Individuality, Humans, Brain, Bayes Theorem, blind source separation; hierarchical independent component analysis; individual network differences; neuroimaging data analysis; reliable estimation of covariate effects on brain networks; sparse Bayesian ICA model, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 75 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts