
AbstractPsychotherapy has been proven to be effective on average, though patients respond very differently to treatment. Understanding which characteristics are associated with treatment effect heterogeneity can help to customize therapy to the individual patient. In this tutorial, we describe different meta-learners, which are flexible algorithms that can be used to estimate personalized treatment effects. More specifically, meta-learners decompose treatment effect estimation into multiple prediction tasks, each of which can be solved by any machine learning model. We begin by reviewing necessary assumptions for interpreting the estimated treatment effects as causal, and then give an overview over key concepts of machine learning. Throughout the article, we use an illustrative data example to show how the different meta-learners can be implemented in R. We also point out how current popular practices in psychotherapy research fit into the meta-learning framework. Finally, we show how heterogeneous treatment effects can be analyzed, and point out some challenges in the implementation of meta-learners.
Psychotherapy, Machine Learning, Treatment Effect Heterogeneity, Causal inference ; Original Article ; Algorithms [MeSH] ; Personalized medicine ; Machine learning ; Treatment effect heterogeneity ; Humans [MeSH] ; Treatment Effect Heterogeneity [MeSH] ; Individual treatment effects ; Machine Learning [MeSH] ; Psychotherapy/methods [MeSH] ; Meta-learners, Humans, Original Article, Algorithms
Psychotherapy, Machine Learning, Treatment Effect Heterogeneity, Causal inference ; Original Article ; Algorithms [MeSH] ; Personalized medicine ; Machine learning ; Treatment effect heterogeneity ; Humans [MeSH] ; Treatment Effect Heterogeneity [MeSH] ; Individual treatment effects ; Machine Learning [MeSH] ; Psychotherapy/methods [MeSH] ; Meta-learners, Humans, Original Article, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
