
This study examines the influence of learning methods and academic administration on academic achievement among students in the Office Administration Education Program at Universitas Negeri Jakarta (UNJ). Recognizing the importance of instructional strategies and academic support in student success, the research seeks to identify correlations between these factors and academic Achievement. Employing a quantitative approach, data will be collected through surveys from 120 students of Office Administration Education as samples using Google Form, with responses analyzed using SPSS. The findings reveal that both learning methods and academic administration play significant roles in enhancing student achievement. Effective learning methods positively impact academic achievement by fostering better understanding and engagement, while well-organized academic administration ensures smooth processes and accessibility, contributing to improved outcomes. These insights emphasize the importance of prioritizing innovative teaching strategies and refining academic administrative systems to create an environment conducive to learning. Educational institutions are encouraged to integrate these approaches to achieve higher levels of academic performance. Future studies could explore other influential factors, such as the integration of technology in learning and administration, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of their impact on student achievement.
Academic Administration, Learning Methods, Student Achievement
Academic Administration, Learning Methods, Student Achievement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
