
ABSTRACTIntroduction/AimsHypermetabolism and weight loss are established negative prognostic factors in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, the role of individualized body composition parameters in predicting ALS progression has been underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between nutritional parameters, neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels, and disease progression in ALS patients.MethodsThe Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria were used to define malnutrition in this study. Nutritional status was assessed using body mass index and bioelectrical impedance analysis. The rate of disease progression was defined by the change in the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale score (ΔFRS). NfL was quantified using single molecule array technology. Spearman's analyses were used to assess correlations.ResultsSixty of 110 ALS patients were classified as malnourished. There was a strong positive correlation between NfL and ΔFRS (r = 0.71), and a moderate negative correlation with disease duration (r = −0.55). The correlations between NfL and body composition parameters were statistically significant, although weak. NfL levels were significantly higher in fast progressors (p < 0.0001 compared to slow progressors) and in malnourished patients (p = 0.0001). Of the 34 fast progressor patients, 28 (82%) exhibited some degree of malnutrition.DiscussionOur findings indicate that poor nutritional status, particularly reduced skeletal muscle mass—both independently and in combination with fat mass loss—is associated with elevated NfL levels and faster ALS progression. NfL, combined with nutritional parameters, could serve as a valuable biomarker for disease severity. Further research is warranted to clarify the role of skeletal muscle abnormalities in ALS progression.
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; malnutrition; neurofilament light chain; rehabilitation; sarcopenia, Clinical Research Article
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; malnutrition; neurofilament light chain; rehabilitation; sarcopenia, Clinical Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
