
handle: 11562/243521
In [11] a method for the analysis of the expected time complexity of a randomized distributed algorithm is presented. The method consists of proving auxiliary probabilistic time bound statements of the form U ~ U’, which mean that whenever the algorithm begins in ‘a state in set U, it will reach a state in set U’ within time t with probability at least p . However, [11] does not provide a formal methodology to prove the validity of a specific probabilistic time bound statement from scratch: each statement is proved by means of ad hoc operational arguments. Unfortunately, operational reasoning is generally error-prone and difficult to check. In this paper we overcome the problem by developing a new technique to prove probabilistic time bound statements, which consists of reducing the analysis of a time bound statement to the analysis of a statement that does not involve probability. As a consequence, several existing techniques for non-randomized algorithms can be applied, and correctness proofs can be verified mechanically.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
