
BackgroundThis study aims to investigate the distribution and drug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary general hospital in Sichuan Province, with the goal of promoting rational antibiotic use and reducing multidrug resistance.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the distribution and drug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria in ICU samples collected from January 2019 to December 2024.ResultsA total of 83,944 culture samples were analyzed, primarily blood (45.27%) and sputum (41.34%) specimens, with a steady increase in sample types annually. A total of 7,211 strains were isolated, 76.43% of which were from respiratory tract specimens. The predominant pathogens included Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.17%), Acinetobacter baumannii (30.11%), Escherichia coli (14.05%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.34%). The detection rates for carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) were 61.88%, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) 29.28%, carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) 5.80%, and carbapenem-resistant E. coli (CREC) 3.04%. Susceptibility testing revealed fluctuating resistance rates for E. coli over the past 6 years. Notably, K. pneumoniae exhibited significant resistance to carbapenems (e.g., imipenem) and third-generation cephalosporins (e.g., ceftazidime).ConclusionFrom 2019 to 2024, the ICU experienced a severe problem with Gram-negative drug-resistant bacteria, particularly Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. A. baumannii isolates demonstrated resistance to most antibiotics, underscoring the need for continuous monitoring and the selection of effective antibiotics based on clinical practice.
distribution patterns, antibiotic resistance, Gram-negative bacteria, antimicrobial agents, intensive care unit (ICU), Microbiology, QR1-502
distribution patterns, antibiotic resistance, Gram-negative bacteria, antimicrobial agents, intensive care unit (ICU), Microbiology, QR1-502
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
