Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Tampere University: ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Urology Focus
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Urology Focus
Article . 2023
Data sources: VIRTA
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Maintenance Therapy with Monthly Instillations and the Southwest Oncology Group Protocol in the Treatment of Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Authors: Nurminen, Pertti; Nummi, Antti; Kesti, Olli; Ettala, Otto; Högerman, Mikael; Järvinen, Riikka; Sairanen, Jukka; +2 Authors

Comparison of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Maintenance Therapy with Monthly Instillations and the Southwest Oncology Group Protocol in the Treatment of Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Abstract

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy using the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) maintenance protocol is the standard in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Maintenance with monthly instillations is also widely used, but evidence comparing the two maintenance protocols is scarce.To compare monthly and SWOG instillation schedules in maintenance BCG therapy.We retrospectively identified patients with NMIBC treated with maintenance BCG according to either the monthly or the SWOG instillation regimen in two tertiary care centers in Finland between 2009 and 2019.We compared discontinuation rates of the monthly and SWOG maintenance protocols due to toxicity, and recurrence and progression rates by protocols. Baseline characteristics were compared with the Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the discontinuation of BCG due to toxicity and oncological efficacy.We identified 723 patients, of whom 545 (75%) and 178 (25%) received maintenance according to the monthly and SWOG protocols, respectively. The median follow-up time was 66 (interquartile range: 45-99) mo. In the monthly and SWOG groups, 131 (24%) and 50 (28%) patients, respectively, discontinued BCG due to toxicity, with no difference in a univariate or multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-1.40, p = 0.940). The 5-yr recurrence-free survival rates in the monthly and SWOG groups were 65% (95% CI: 61-69%) and 71% (95% CI: 64-79%, p = 0.370), respectively. The 5-yr progression-free survival rates were 89% (95% CI: 86-92%) and 91% (95% CI: 86-96%, p = 0.240), respectively.Monthly maintenance is a comparable alternative to the SWOG protocol.In this study, we compared two schedules of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment used in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We found that there were no significant differences between the two instillation schedules in terms of tolerability or efficacy.

Country
Finland
Keywords

3126, Toxicity, Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology, 610, ta3121, 3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology, ta3122, Instillation therapy, Administration, Intravesical, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, BCG Vaccine, Non-muscle-invasive bladder, Humans, Maintenance therapy, Cancers, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, Cancer, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research