Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Perceptually Optimized Embedded Image Coder and Quality Assessor Based on Visual Tools

Authors: Abderrahim Bajit; Mohammed Nahid; Abdellah Lassioui; Ahmed Tamtaoui;

A Perceptually Optimized Embedded Image Coder and Quality Assessor Based on Visual Tools

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new Perceptually Optimized Embedded ZeroTree Image Coder EVIC and Quality Assessor WVDP. The coder introduces a perceptual weighting to wavelet coefficients prior to control SPIHT encoding algorithm in order to reach a targeted bit rate with a perceptual quality improvement with respect to the coding quality of the SPIHT algorithm only. The paper also, introduces a new objective quality metric based on Daly visual model known as Visible Difference Predictor that integrates the properties of the HVS and plays an important role in our EVIC quality assessment. Our EVIC coder is based on a vision model that incorporates various masking effects of human visual system HVS perception. Thus, our coder weights the wavelet coefficients based on that model and enhances the perceptual quality for a given bit rate and observation distance. The model weights within all wavelet sub bands are computed with respect to 1) luminance masking and Contrast masking deployed to ensure threshold elevation, 2) the contrast sensitivity function CSF to filter invisible frequencies, 3) the Just Noticeable Differences JND used to take into account only wavelet coefficients with respect to that perceptual thresholds. The EVIC coder has the same computational algorithm complexity as the standard SPIHT. However, the experimental results show that it demonstrates very good performances in terms of image coding and quality measurement.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!