
arXiv: 2403.17766
We study the computational limits of the following general hypothesis testing problem. Let H=H_{n} be an arbitrary undirected graph. We study the detection task between a “null” Erdős–Rényi random graph G(n,p) and a “planted” random graph which is the union of G(n,p) together with a random copy of H=H_{n} . Our notion of planted model is a generalization of a plethora of recently studied models initiated with the study of the planted clique model (Jerrum, 1992), which corresponds to the special case where H is a k -clique and p=1/2 .Over the last decade, several papers have studied the power of low-degree polynomials for limited choices of H ’s in the above task. In this work, we adopt a unifying perspective and characterize the power of constant degree polynomials for the detection task, when H=H_{n} is any arbitrary graph and for any p=\Omega(1) . Perhaps surprisingly, we prove that an optimal constant degree polynomial is always given by simply counting stars in the input random graph. As a direct corollary, we conclude that the class of constant-degree polynomials is only able to “sense” the degree distribution of the planted graph H , and no other graph theoretic property of it.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computational Complexity, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), Statistics Theory (math.ST), Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computational Complexity, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), Statistics Theory (math.ST), Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
